A Question of Health

Dr Fred Kavalier
Wednesday 07 March 2001 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I am trying to get pregnant and someone has recommended that I take a folic acid supplement. But I have heard that folic acid is now added to bread. Is there any danger that I could take in too much?

I am trying to get pregnant and someone has recommended that I take a folic acid supplement. But I have heard that folic acid is now added to bread. Is there any danger that I could take in too much?

If you are trying to get pregnant, you should be taking a folic acid supplement of 400 micrograms a day, and you should continue until the 12th week of pregnancy. A committee of scientific experts has advised the Government that all flour should be fortified with folic acid, but the recommendation has not yet been accepted. Having a good level of folic acid can reduce the chance of having a baby with spina bifida by nearly 50 per cent. For some older people, there may be a small risk from taking too much folic acid, but for young women who are trying for a pregnancy, the benefits far outweigh the risks.

Last autumn, I had a burning sensation in my groin and penis, accompanied by frequent urination. The GP carried out a rectal examination of my prostate and said he thought it was prostatitis. He referred me to a urologist who did a further rectal examination and confirmed the original diagnosis. I have had two lots of different antibiotics, which seem to have cleared things up. I was surprised that a PSA test for prostate cancer had not been done. Although I am reassured that two doctors believe I am not suffering from anything more severe than prostate inflammation, I do think a PSA test would have been a wise precaution. What do you think?

There is a lot of controversy about the PSA blood test. Although it can pick up prostate cancer at an early stage, it is not completely reliable. It is possible to have cancer even though the test is normal, or to have a raised blood test without having cancer. I would advise against a blood test until your prostatitis is completely cured, because any inflammation of the prostate can cause the PSA test to be abnormal. Rectal examinations can also cause the PSA level to go up. For further information, have a look at the patient information leaflet on the PSA test from the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (www.york. ac.uk/inst/crd/em22b.htm).

Please send your questions to A Question of Health, 'The Independent', Independent House, 191 Marsh Wall, London E14 9RS; fax 020-7005 2182 or e-mail to health@ independent. co.uk. Dr Kavalier regrets that he is unable to respond personally to questions

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in