£5.9m drive 'fails to cut teenage pregnancies'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A £5.9m government drive to cut pregnancies among disadvantaged teenagers failed when numbers actually increased, research published in the British Medical Journal suggests.
The Young People's Development Programme (YPDP) ran in 27 parts of England in 2004-07, based on a similar model in New York. It was designed to offer education and support to young people aged 13 to 15 who were deemed at risk of exclusion from school, drug abuse and teenage pregnancy. A total of 2,371 teenagers took part in the programme, at a cost of £2,500 each.
But research out today shows that young women who attended the programme were "significantly" more likely to fall pregnant than those in a comparison group. A total of 16 per cent of the YPDP group fell pregnant compared with 6 per cent in the other group – a youth programme not receiving YPDP funds. This was despite those in the YPDP group receiving education about sex and drugs, being no more sexually active than the other group and some sites distributing free condoms.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments