Cholesterol: cheaper statin is just as effective

Monday 02 October 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

My wife takes a statin tablet to lower her cholesterol. For reasons of economy, it has been suggested that she change from Lipitor (also known as atorvastatin) to simvastatin. Is there any difference in their effects?

Dr Fred Kavalier answers your health question:

Statins have been described by the British Medical Journal as "one of the great success stories of preventive medicine". They are credited with preventing heart attacks, strokes and illnesses linked to high cholesterol levels. In 2004, the NHS spent 738m on statins. The two main statin drugs prescribed - simvastatin and atorvastatin - account for much of this. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence suggests that 14 per cent of adults should take statins. The usual simvastatin dose is either 20mg or 40mg a day; for atorvastatin it is 10mg or 20mg a day. Simvastatin (no longer protected by a patent) is much cheaper. Although you need to take more simvastatin for an equivalent effect, the drugs do much the same thing and are equally safe and effective. As with all drugs, some patients will get side effects on one but not another. Every time a patient is started on simvastatin rather than atorvastatin, the NHS expects to save about 1,000 over five years. Changing patients from atorvastatin to simvastatin could save the NHS 2bn in five years. The argument for using simvastatin seems pretty convincing to me.

Please mail your questions for Dr Fred to health@independent.co.uk. He regrets that he is unable to respond personally to questions.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in