Gluten-free food isn't healthier for you, new study indicates
It’s also far more expensive
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Eating gluten-free food isn’t necessarily beneficial for your health, a new study has claimed.
The study, published in the February issue of the Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, compared the nutrient content and cost of regular and gluten-free food products in the UK.
Researchers from the University of Hertfordshire assessed the nutritional information and costs of the food products by collecting the data from manufacturer and supermarket websites.
While many people nowadays have begun following gluten-free diets or eating a reduced amount of food containing gluten, this may not be a wise course of action.
For those who have medical conditions such as coeliac disease, eating gluten-free foods is essential for their wellbeing.
However, for others, this isn’t the case.
According to the researchers, there’s no reason why anyone who doesn’t have a medical condition affected by the consumption of gluten should be avoiding it altogether.
“GF [gluten-free] food is unlikely to offer healthier alternatives to regular foods, except for those who require a GF diet for medically diagnosed conditions, and it is associated with higher costs,” the study concluded.
The researchers discovered that gluten-free foods typically contained more saturated fat, sugar and salt than regular food items, while also being lower in fibre and protein content.
The results of the study also highlighted the difference in cost between regular food and gluten-free food.
Gluten-free food products were approximately 159 per cent more expensive than regular food.
On the Waitrose website, you can see that 500g of Waitrose LoveLife gluten-free spaghetti is sold for £1.89, in comparison to 500g of regular essential Waitrose spaghetti for 89p.
In this instance, the price of a regular food item is over double the cost of the gluten-free version.
Around one in every 100 people in the UK suffer from coeliac disease.
However, in April last year it was reported that sales of “free from” products had seen an increase of 36 per cent in comparison to the previous year.
Experts have warned that avoiding gluten when you don’t need to could increase your risk of cardiovascular disease.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments