Does ‘good cholesterol’ really deserve its name?
Having very high levels of HDL is associated with increased mortality. But that doesn't mean it's not 'good cholesterol'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.People with extremely high levels of so-called “good cholesterol” have a 65 per cent higher mortality rate than people with normal levels, according to a new Danish study. Does this mean that good cholesterol has gone from hero to villain? Can we still consider good cholesterol to be good?
Cholesterol, it seems, is never far from the news. Scientific studies frequently report that cholesterol and the drugs that control cholesterol, such as statins, are implicated in many conditions beyond heart disease, from Alzheimer’s to cancer. Cholesterol is essential for life, and is found throughout the body. It is a waxy substance made in the the liver but is also found in some foods, including full-cream dairy and animal fats.
Cholesterol can’t travel through the blood on its own as it doesn’t dissolve in the watery blood plasma. In order to travel in the blood, cholesterol combines with proteins to form lipoproteins. There are two main types of lipoproteins, low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and high-density lipoproteins (HDL). LDL is commonly referred to as “bad cholesterol” because it delivers cholesterol from the liver to the other cells in the body. HDL is known as “good cholesterol” because it does the reverse, carrying cholesterol back to the liver to be broken down.
Changes to the levels of cholesterol in the blood can lead to a build up of fatty material in the walls of arteries, increasing the risk of stroke or heart attack. This risk is known to be particularly high if a person has a high ratio of LDL to HDL. Effectively, high HDL levels reduce the risk of heart disease, whereas low levels increase it. New evidence, however, suggests that this might not always be the case.
U-shaped risk
In the new Danish study, more than 116,000 Danish men and women were pooled together from two large study cohorts. Participants had a blood sample taken at the start of the study and their cholesterol was measured. They were then followed up for a number of years – in some cases for as long as 23 years.
During the follow-up period, more than 10,000 participants died. When the researchers analysed the data, they found something very interesting. The relationship between HDL levels and mortality was U-shaped. This means that people with either extremely high or low concentrations of HDL had an increased risk of death. Those people with the highest levels of HDL were more likely to die than those with normal levels of HDL, and about as likely as those with the very lowest levels of HDL.
There were some noticeable differences between men and women, with the ideal HDL level in men being around 25 per cent lower than in women.
The researchers might have anticipated that low levels of HDL would be a risk factor for an early death but evidence that the highest levels of HDL carry a similar risk is very interesting. So what do these findings mean for the rest us?
A genetic cause?
No study is perfect. Although this study was very large it relied on a single blood sample at the point of recruitment and was limited to white people of Danish descent. This means any changes in HDL level that may have occurred throughout the study were not taken into account, and the findings may not be applicable to more ethnically mixed populations.
Very few people actually have very high HDL levels. In this study only 216 men and 218 women out of 116,000 showed the highest concentrations of HDL, so the number of people affected in real terms may be low, even if the relative risk is high.
The study does, however, give us an opportunity to consider what we really know about HDL. Although consistent observational evidence of the relationship between HDL and the risk of heart disease exists, the relationship doesn’t appear to be causal because boosting HDL levels (but not to ultra-high levels) using drugs doesn’t decrease the risk of heart disease or early death.
It is possible that a genetic mutation is the root cause of extremely high HDL, which is why these cases are so rare. As HDL has subtypes, it is also possible that one or more of these subtypes are key in preventing heart disease, but more research is needed to confirm this.
Doctors should take note of this study and consider that if they see cases of extremely high levels of HDL in their patients it may be worth monitoring. It is, however, unlikely that many people reading this article will have HDL levels high enough to cause them, or their doctor, to worry. In general, it is still a good idea to assume that good cholesterol is good for your heart.
James Brown is a senior lecturer in biology and biomedical science at Aston University. This article was originally published on The Conversation (www.theconversation.com)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments