Good riddance to good taste

Tuesday 17 March 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Allen Jones prints: torpedo breasts, high-heeled fetish boots, tight skirts. Seedy piano bars. Men in broad-brimmed hats and kipper ties. His achievement has been to shoehorn tastelessness into art or, to put it more kindly, to banish tastefulness.

Before Jones's Pop Art of the Sixties, art was pretty and was bought by the pretty rich. You could, of course, hark back to Duchamp's urinal (1917) as the heavy object that shattered the polished vitrine of fine art, as well as the moustache and beard that he added to the Mona Lisa. They are an art-historical succes de scandale. But even avant-garde Cubism and Dada adhered to the laws of form and composition in order to qualify as art. What was lacking was a platoon of artists willing to follow Duchamp through the hole in the glass and capture the dominant images of everyday life - the motifs of consumerism, the blatant excesses of low-life fashion.

Jones's stuff is, of course, old hat. We've moved on. But his datedness, paradoxically, is the point. He spotted the aesthetic of the time - tight, shiny, fetishistic - and stretched it to its limits. At the time, those who did not share his eagle eye latched on to one aspect of his work: sex. Today, as the reaction to Stehli's work demonstrates, the joke is on them.

Jones had been an established name for 10 years before he produced Table Sculpture, which, along with others in the series, sold quickly and are now in major museum collections. But at the opening bash for the sculptures at the Arthur Tooth gallery in London in 1970, some art fanciers who should have known better were unsure whether to treat his work as art. Jones recalls a woman whose eye caught his as she was about to put her empty wine glass on the now-famous glass tabletop. "Should I or shouldn't?", she signalled to him through the crowd. "It's up to you." Jones signalled back with a shrug. And did she plonk her glass on his art? "I can't remember," says Jones.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in