Games people play
Pandora Melly learns how philosophers play Scrabble
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Professor Richard Gregory, 73, cognitive scientist and writer
Wittgenstein said that thinking is a language game - I bet he never played Scrabble. I used to play, but gave it up for science and philosophy. Scrabble isn't actually a game about language. Instead it divests words of their meanings and reduced them to tokens with which one can score points. This is exactly how money is played by economists in the game of monetarism, where a currency is more important than what it can buy. Rather like trying to control the weather by pushing the hand up and down on a barometer!
For writers, words are bricks to be formed into sentence-structures of meaning. Sometimes their structure can be beautiful, in the same way that a building can be beautiful. Couldn't there be a Scrabble for interesting sentences? Or more abstractly, what philosophers call propositions. "Proposition" is a very useful word because it makes the distinction between the sentence - which is a collection of words - and what the sentence actually means.
If proposition Scrabble caught on, reviewers of books might score sentences for their proposition value, awarding meaning and length indices. So we come back to quantifying. But can meanings be valued by numbers? If meaning was more calculable, could one quantify the sylliness of syllables or the soapiness of soap operas? And might we assign points to politicians like cricket scores?
Normally you don't attach a number to a book by saying: "This book is 0.9 good" - although you do when you're marking examination-papers and allocating numbers to somebody's essay. I've never liked doing that, because a number can refer only to one dimension.
I like punning very much, which is really playing games with words. It's in my Who's Whom entry. What do you think of "Cooking in Ancient Greece" as a title for a recipe book?
For a fascinating discussion of the comparative abilities of the brains of ants and elephants, the reader is referred to issue 3, vol 26 (1997) of "Perception" (Ed. Richard Gregory), which Internet users may find at: http://www.pion.co.uk/perception
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments