Games: chess
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.With all the top-class chess at the world championship at Wijk aan Zee, it`s a long time since we had a straightforward problem in this space. Today's position, however, is far from straightforward, but is an example of one of the weirder genres of the problem world.
This position, composed by Garen Yacoubian of France in 1976, is an example of what one might call the pedantic school of series-helpmate. In an ordinary series helpmate, Black makes a specified number of moves to reach a position in which White can deliver instant checkmate. The only restrictions are that Black must not move into check, and may not deliver a check until his final move.
The pedantic version, however, also demands that every position reached after each move of the solution must be legal. The diagram position is a good example. It is a series helpmate (of the pedantic variety) in 11.
The idea is easy enough: Black must block the squares a2, b3 and b2 to reach a position in which Nc2 is mate. So let's start 1.fxe6, 2.exd5, 3.dxc4, 4.cxb3 and now we must stop to think. The obvious continuation is 5.bxa2, 6.Rb3, 7.g3, 8.g2, 9.g1=B, 10.Bd4 and 11.Bb2 - but that's not the answer. Look again at the position after 10.Bd4 and you will see that it is illegal: there is no possible White move that could have led to it. The knight cannot have moved from c2 (where Black would have been in check), and the king cannot have moved to a5 without having been in an impossible double-check.
We must go back to move four to correct matters. The right answer demands a little more delicacy: 5.b2, 6.Rb3, 7.g3, 8.g2, 9.g1=Q, 10.Qb1, 11.Qxa2 and White plays Nc2 mate.
The difference is that after 6.Rb3, the b6 square is now only covered once and the position is legal. White's previous move would have been with his king from b6 to a5.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments