Games: Chess

William Hartston
Sunday 15 February 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

To judge by a recent trend in publishing, chessplayers are very bad at keeping secrets. "Secrets" seems to be the buzz-word of the moment in book titles, with a number of players rushing to put their secrets into print.

After 60 pages of the first volume of Secrets of the Russian Chess Masters by Lev Alburt and Larry Parr (WW Norton & Co; pounds 18.95 for each of two volumes) we are still on exercises such as "which piece can the white knight not capture?" The second volume, subtitled "Beyond the basics", goes into elementary positional and tactical principles, but calling this elementary set "Secrets of the Russian Chess Masters" suggests that the Russian Official Secrets Act is even more stringent than our own.

John Nunn's Secrets of Practical Chess, pounds 14.99 from the new English specialist chess publisher Gambit, takes up long after the Russian secrets leave off. I was delighted to see that he begins with a criticism of the analytical method advised in Alexander Kotov's Think Like a Grandmaster. Rather than working his way along every branch of Kotov's rigid "Tree of Analysis", Nunn prefers a flexible approach, letting ideas suggested by one variation lead to improvements in other lines. Here's a study he gives as an example, composed by J Gunst in 1922. It is White to play and win.

At first it looks as though the game must end in a draw: after 1.Bxd7 Kc7, or 1.Bb7 Kc7, or 1.Ba6 Kc7 Black wins one of the white pieces at once. Then you notice the idea of 1.Ba6 Kc7 2.Kc5 Kxb8 3.Kd6 Ka8 4.Kc7 and mate with Bb7 next move. But after 1.Ba6 Kc7 2.Kc5, Black plays 2...d6+! 3.Kd5 Kxb8 4.Kd6 Ka8 when 5.Kc7 is stalemate. You find the right answer by jumping back (in a way Kotov would have condemned) to a line already analysed: 1.Bb7! Kc7 2.Ba6! Kxb8 (or 2...d6 3.Nc6) 3.Kd6 Ka8 4.Kc7 d6 5.Bb7 mate. A highly instructive book, if a little expensive.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in