Games: Bridge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I was curiously pleased by this simple-looking deal - not because (in common with the rest of the field) we failed to defeat South's contract of Three No-trumps, but by winning 30 pesetas (approximately 8p) in side bets with the other three players when I maintained that we could have come to five tricks.
In practice, South opened One No-trump and North raised to game. I led 46 against Three No-trumps and this went to the five, king and ace. Declarer set to work on the diamonds, and it is easy to see that in no way could he lose more than four tricks (to 4Q, !A and #A,K).
What, then, was the miracle defence that I envisaged? Club or heart leads, although they are good tries, do not quite work. No, I stuck to my original lead of 46. The bizarre secret was for East to withhold his king and follow with the two. Now, how does the play proceed?
Presumably South wins with his ten and attacks diamonds. West goes in with his ace on the first round of the suit and leads another spade to the nine, king and ace. Now, when East gets in with his #K, he can lead 43 through South's 4J,6 for West to collect two tricks in the suit with his 4Q,8.
Would this have been a practical defence to find? Hardly, for East would have looked remarkably foolish at trick one if I had led from, say, 4Q,10,8,6,4 and the high cards in the other suits had been slightly rearranged.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments