Games: Bridge

Alan Hiron
Thursday 30 April 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

This deal came up in the 1976 World Championship in Monte Carlo and proved difficult to bid to the best scoring pairs contract. About half of the field (44 tables) reached the indifferent contract of Six Hearts.

South usually opened Two No-trumps, the heart fit was established, and when North invited a slam, South accepted on the strength of his good controls. Was the heart slam a good prospect? Hardly, for with a sure spade loser, you need trumps to split 2-2 and the king with East - about a 25 per cent chance. Therefore, if you insist on playing in a slam, Six No-trumps depends on exactly the same and scores better.

Whether in game or a slam, all of the Souths duly made their 12 obvious tricks. Well, nearly all: one unfortunate Austrian declarer had Benito Garozzo on lead against his Six Hearts and Benito chose !9 for his opening lead.

The ten of hearts went to the king and ace, and declarer faced a nightmare decision when he later led a low trump from dummy and East followed with the six. Had Garozzo led a singleton !9, or had he chosen the nine from !J,9? There would have been no story, I suppose, if he had got it right, but is it not curious that the only possible way for the defenders to come to a trump trick was to lead one into declarer's tenace?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in