Gambling

David Spanier
Thursday 14 March 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Bet first, ask questions later. The casino industry's has been hasty in its enthusiasm for the Home Office's new proposals to ease restrictions on gaming. The fine print suggests that it will be a while before changes come through. In gambling there are no sure things, especially in legislation.

For casinos, only three changes -all relatively minor - appear likely in the lifetime of the present Parliament: reduction of the 48-hour waiting period to 24-hours; extension of the liquor licensing hours; and payment by debit cards. The procedure is as follows: the discussion period runs up to 31 May; then the Home Office collates responses and draws up deregulation orders; next, these are examined in committee in the Commons and Lords. Finally, if nothing goes wrong, the orders will pass into law. If a general election intervenes - at least an even- money bet - this timetable is completely shot.

On the major changes proposed - casino advertising, slot machines, postal applications and group membership - prospects of a speedy result are, unfortunately, more remote. There is no realistic chance of these changes coming into operation in the life of the present Parliament. As the Home Office makes clear, "a further round of consultation" is required. This is, essentially, to clarify what is involved - in advertising, for example, what is a "listings magazine"? in slot machines, what size and style of pay-outs? In theory, this second period of consultation could begin immediately after the present round, so that changes in primary legislation could be concluded within a year. In practice, that is not going to happen. Sympathetic as they may be, Home Office ministers have other things to worry about before the election.

After it, a new team at the Home Office will very likely pick up the reins and gallop ahead. Everyone involved, including the Gaming Board, recognizes that change is overdue. But all this will take time and effort. If opponents of gambling get a second wind, new hurdles may strew the course. Good times are coming for casinos - but not just yet.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in