Uber executive Emil Michael suggests exposing 'personal lives and families' of female reporters who write negatively about car hire app

Comes after company was criticised for teaming up with 'French escort service' for sexist promotion

Adam Withnall
Tuesday 18 November 2014 04:51 EST
Comments
Above all things: Germany’s car-sharing UberPop app has stirred passions and a legal challenge
Above all things: Germany’s car-sharing UberPop app has stirred passions and a legal challenge (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of Uber’s most senior executives has been forced to apologise after suggesting the car company should hire a team of researchers to dig up dirt on the “personal lives” and “families” of journalists who write negatively about the controversial car hire company.

Emil Michael made the comments with specific reference to a female reporter who has in the past written that she deleted her Uber app after the company teamed up with an apparent escort service in France.

At a high-profile dinner party attended by the actor Ed Norton and publisher Arianna Huffington, Michael was asked about such depictions of Uber in the media.

According to Buzzfeed News, the senior vice president of business suggested the company spend $1 million hiring four researchers and four journalists to investigate “your personal lives, your families” and discredit those behind the unfavourable reports.

Emil Michael, Uber's senior vice president of business
Emil Michael, Uber's senior vice president of business

The female reporter, Sarah Lacy, wrote a column on her tech website PandoDaily accusing Uber of “sexism and misogyny” and not “respect[ing] us or priorit[sing] our safety”.

Michael reportedly responded by saying Lacy should be held “personally responsible” for any woman who also deleted her Uber app and was later sexually assaulted by a taxi driver.

Screengrab showing the English-language version of the Avions de Chasse homepage, which featured in an Uber promotion earlier this year
Screengrab showing the English-language version of the Avions de Chasse homepage, which featured in an Uber promotion earlier this year

The executive has since taken to Twitter to apologise for his comments, which according to Buzzfeed he believed were made off the record.

Writing to Lacy herself, Michael said: “I would like to apologize to you directly. My comments were wrong and I deeply regret them.

“Neither me nor my company would ever engage in such activities. Again, I apologize.”

Also on Twitter, Lacy said Michael had since called her to explain his comments “off record” – which she refused. “You threaten my family and you want to chat off record? Um no,” she wrote. She also shared a number of tweets from people saying they had joined her in deleting Uber from their phones.

A spokesperson for Uber told The Independent that the company “has not, does not and will not investigate journalists”. “Those remarks have no basis in the reality of our approach,” he said.

A statement from Michael, issued via Uber, said: “The remarks attributed to me at a private dinner – borne out of frustration during an informal debate over what I feel is sensationalistic media coverage of the company I am proud to work for – do not reflect my actual views and have no relation to the company’s views or approach. They were wrong no matter the circumstance and I regret them.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in