What Theresa May needs to do if she’s going to regulate the internet
'Right now the tech community distrusts government when it tries to intervene in this way'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Theresa May fiercely criticised technology companies in the wake of the London Bridge terror attack, but can’t expect to achieve anything by making "one-sided" appeals, says a cybersecurity expert.
She accused tech firms of providing terrorists with “safe spaces” online, and has called for the internet to be regulated.
However, Ms May needs to ensure the protection of citizens’ rights, before attempting to point the finger of blame at others.
“Any request for a tech company to do more than is required needs to come with corresponding government actions to protect citizens, so we don’t end up putting their rights at risk,” Simon Crosby, the co–founder and CTO of Bromium, told The Independent.
“There has to be a collaborative effort going forward, taking the rights of the people, the reputation of the tech community, and what the government wants into account.”
Unsurprisingly, Ms May's comments provoked widespread outrage, with technology giants including Facebook, Google and Twitter quick to defend their policies.
“We cannot allow this ideology the safe space it needs to breed,” she said. “Yet that is precisely what the internet, and the big companies that internet-based services provide.
“We need to work with allied democratic governments to reach international agreements that regulate cyberspace to prevent the spread of extremist and terrorism planning.”
She intends to introduce huge restrictions on what people can post, share and publish online, and Amber Rudd recently branded WhatsApp’s use of end-to-end encryption as “completely unacceptable”.
Confusingly, she also called for the company to let secret services read encrypted messages, despite the fact that not even WhatsApp can access them.
As the technology community has repeatedly stressed, banning encryption would be disastrous, as it would completely expose innocent people to criminals.
“It is perfectly reasonable to make laws that protect society,” said Mr Crosby. “However, right now the tech community distrusts government when it tries to intervene in this way. This is because they are being asked to break their promise of guaranteeing the security of their customer data by opening it up to the government.
“What does it mean to a big tech company when a government asks to look at their data? They lose the trust of their customers.
“Theresa May is not in control of this situation; the tech companies are, so she can’t make a one-sided appeal. Additionally, the broad use of surveillance freaks everyone out.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments