Outlook email taken down in China, as Gmail block continues

Monitoring site claims that outage was the work of the government body that censors the internet

Andrew Griffin
Tuesday 20 January 2015 05:31 EST
Comments
A chinese man plays online games at an internet cafe in Beijing
A chinese man plays online games at an internet cafe in Beijing (AFP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

Microsoft’s Outlook email service seems to have been taken offline over the weekend, weeks after Google’s Gmail was taken offline.

Outlook appears to have been taking down using a “man-in-the-middle” attack, according to Greatfire.org, the Chinese internet monitoring group. Such attacks allow those carrying them out to listen in on emails — users are usually alerted to the fact by a pop-up, but not always, and stopping people doing so will mean not using email at all.

The attack only worked for those viewing outlook through desktop clients, and web interfaces like Outlook.com remain online.

The attack comes weeks after Gmail was taken offline at Christmas. Though service seemed initially to have resumed, it is still offline for many people and Google’s transparency report shows that traffic from China is vastly reduced.

Though the Outlook hack seems to have been fixed and so only lasted for a day, it was potentially more damaging since it meant that whoever was carrying it out could read emails, rather than taking the service offline.

Greatfire.org said that it suspected that the Cyberspace Administration of China, which mains the “great firewall” was responsible for the attack “or have willingly allowed it to happen”.

The site wrote: “If our accusation is correct, this new attack signals that the Chinese authorities are intent on further cracking down on communication methods that they cannot readily monitor.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in