Facebook could farm users' thoughts with mind-reading technology to sell adverts

The company calls its technology a 'brain-computer speech-to-text interface'

Aatif Sulleyman
Thursday 25 May 2017 06:50 EDT
Comments
There are fears that Facebook could record the private thoughts people don't want to share, as well as the ones they do
There are fears that Facebook could record the private thoughts people don't want to share, as well as the ones they do (REUTERS/Stephen Lam)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Facebook may be planning to use people’s thoughts for advertising purposes.

The social network is developing advanced new technologies that would let you type words “directly from your brain”.

Its ambitious vision has caused widespread concern amongst privacy advocates, and the company has refused to confirm or deny if it will use people’s thoughts to sell ads.

“We are developing an interface that allows you to communicate with the speed and flexibility of voice and the privacy of text,” Facebook spokesperson Ha Thai told The Intercept’s Sam Biddle, after being asked if the company would use people’s brain activity for advertising.

“Specifically, only communications that you have already decided to share by sending them to the speech center of your brain. Privacy will be built into this system, as every Facebook effort.”

When pressed on the matter, Mr Thai replied, “Sam, that’s the best answer I can provide as of right now.”

Facebook calls its technology a “brain-computer speech-to-text interface”, and the company has a team of 60 people working on it at Building 8, its futuristic hardware division.

Instead of contacting a friend with a call or a text, you’d be able to transmit your thoughts to them through wearable Facebook sensors.

It was officially unveiled at the F8 conference last month.

“This isn’t about decoding your random thoughts,” the company announced. “Think of it like this: You take many photos and choose to share only some of them. Similarly, you have many thoughts and choose to share only some of them.

“This is about decoding those words you’ve already decided to share by sending them to the speech center of your brain. It’s a way to communicate with the speed and flexibility of your voice and the privacy of text.”

However, a Facebook report from 2013 revealed that the company quietly keeps records of what users type and choose not to share.

“We find that: people with more boundaries to regulate censor more; males censor more posts than females and censor even more posts with mostly male friends than do females, but censor no more comments than females; people who exercise more control over their audience censor more content; and, users with more politically and age diverse friends censor less, in general,” reads the report.

There’s little reason to believe Facebook won’t take the same approach with people’s thoughts, where “self-censorship” is absolutely critical. People filter their own private thoughts constantly, and almost always for a good reason.

“What we learn from companies like Facebook is that if they can make money out of it, they will try to get you to agree to it,” Jim Killock, the executive director of the Open Rights Group, told The Independent.

“They will always argue that intimate data is needed to deliver their services—using it for advertising is just an extra little step.

“Facebook’s business is knowing what you think and feel. I personally would not wish to be brain chipped with technology I have little control over."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in