Brexit: Pro-Leave Twitter bots played ‘strategic role’ in EU referendum result, says Oxford University study
Social media sites have to redesign themselves if democracy is to survive, the report warns
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Bots and trolls are working together to spread propaganda and manipulate Twitter and Facebook users’ political views, says a new study from the University of Oxford.
Bots “played a small but strategic role” in shaping Twitter conversations during the EU referendum last year, according to the report.
“The family of hashtags associated with the argument for leaving the EU dominated, while less than one percent of sampled accounts generated almost a third of all the messages,” it says.
They also affected the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election, the study adds.
“Computational propaganda is one of the most powerful new tools against democracy,” warns the report.
It describes computational propaganda as a “phenomenon that encompasses recent digital misinformation and manipulation efforts”, which “involves learning from and mimicking real people so as to manipulate public opinion across a diverse range of platforms and device networks”.
According to the study, which analysed tens of millions of social media posts across seven different platforms during elections, political crises, and national security incidents in nine countries, computational propaganda is most effective when bots and trolls work together.
Facebook in particular has attracted a great deal of criticism in recent months, due to the rise of fake news.
Mark Zuckerberg initially denied that false stories spread through the social network had an effect on the Presidential election, but changed his stance soon after.
According to the University of Oxford study, social media sites need to redesign themselves in order to regain trust.
“For democracies, we should assume that encouraging people to vote is a good thing. Promoting political news and information from reputable outlets is crucial. Ultimately, designing for democracy, in systematic ways, will help restore trust in social media systems,” it says.
“Computational propaganda is now one of the most powerful tools against democracy. Social media firms may not be creating this nasty content, but they are the platform for it.
“They need to significantly redesign themselves if democracy is going to survive social media.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments