Apple reduces the cut it takes from smaller developers as controversy continues over its App Store commissions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Apple will reduce the cut it takes from smaller App Store developers, amid ongoing controversy over the cut it takes from sales.
The company will only charge 15 per cent to developers that make less than $1 million a year, it has said, as part of an "App Store Small Business Program".
With some exceptions, Apple takes a 30 per cent cut of everything that is sold on the App Store, and any purchases of digital services that are made through those apps even when they are on users phones. That policy has led to significant fallout, including with Fortnite developers Epic, who pulled the game from the App Store earlier this year amid a public spat.
Now the company says that its smaller developers – which represents a significant portion of the number of people selling apps through the store – will have that commission halved.
Apple said that the program had been launched "at an important time as small and independent developers continue working to innovate and thrive during a period of unprecedented global economic challenge", amid coronavirus lockdowns and other international issues. It did not mention the fallouts with big developers over the charges, or the antitrust accusations that have arisen in the wake of them.
The full details of whether developers are eligible for the programme will be revealed in early December, Apple said. But to quality, existing developers will be counted if they made less than $1 million in a given year – if they make more, they will pay the full 30 per cent for the remaining time in the year and the one that follows, though they will be able to qualify again the following year.
Over the summer, Apple released independent research into App Store fees that showed that most comparable digit marketplaces charge the same 30 per cent cut on the sales of digital products and services. It repeated the findings of that study in the new announcement, which will not cover the many large developers who have publicly complained about Apple’s App Store rules.
The company said that it hoped the extra revenues being given back to smaller developers would help them invest and take more risks, despite difficulties in the global business climate.
“Small businesses are the backbone of our global economy and the beating heart of innovation and opportunity in communities around the world. We’re launching this program to help small business owners write the next chapter of creativity and prosperity on the App Store, and to build the kind of quality apps our customers love,” said Tim Cook, Apple’s chief executive, in a statement.
“The App Store has been an engine of economic growth like none other, creating millions of new jobs and a pathway to entrepreneurship accessible to anyone with a great idea. Our new program carries that progress forward — helping developers fund their small businesses, take risks on new ideas, expand their teams, and continue to make apps that enrich people’s lives.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments