Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Peers reject 'Good Samaritan' food donation plan for Britain

 

Zander Swinburne
Saturday 05 April 2014 17:48 EDT
Comments
The House of Lords was unconvinced of the need for a food 'Good Samaritan law'
The House of Lords was unconvinced of the need for a food 'Good Samaritan law'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The House of Lords rejected the introduction of a food "Good Samaritan law" in Britain, fearing it would lead to "perverse consequences" for sandwich chains and supermarkets already donating their surplus food.

Legislation implemented in the US in 1996 under the Good Samaritan Food Donation Act, encourages supermarkets and café chains to donate food to the needy by protecting them from legal liability should their products make the recipient ill.

The Lords EU Committee, which issues its report today, said it was "unconvinced of the need for a Good Samaritan Act" in the UK, as it feared that a public discussion around the issue may scare away possible donors.

"Nobody gave us any evidence of there being a problem... nobody we spoke to quoted legal liability for the safety of their food as a reason for not giving," said Baroness Scott of Needham Market, the chairwoman of the committee.

"I don't know whether America being more litigious by nature, they felt there would be a need for this but here nobody we spoke to quoted legal liability for the safety of their food as a reason for not giving. We felt, to be honest, it was a bit of a solution in search of problem."

Lindsay Boswell of FareShare, one of the UK's largest food charities, said there was no desire to introduce a Good Samaritan Act in the UK.

Giving evidence to the committee, he said there was "some danger around the discussion", adding: "We work with major high-street fast-food retailers, be it sandwich manufacturers or other fast-food outlets about the ability to redistribute that food. None of them raised [this issue]."

But FoodCycle, a food donating organisation that has served more than 86,000 meals to those in need since 2009, argued that the issue should be debated before being discounted.

CEO Mary McGrath said: "We should be investigating every single barrier to food being donated and it should be up for public debate, as the amount of food being wasted is quite phenomenal."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in