'Cheeky' Nando's under fire for apparently coming onto a customer on Twitter
It attempted to slide into her DMs following several winky emoticons
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In a bizarre 'brand social media gone wrong' story, Nando's stands accused of flirting with a customer on Twitter.
The purveyor of Portuguese chicken, which initiated the conversation, offered to come to user @ells_' house to make things 'hot'.
"I thought I could handle Nandos hot chicken. But boyyyy the way my mouth was burning," Elle originally tweeted.
She didn't @ the company, but it presumably found the tweet by name-searching, replying "can't handle the heat Elle?" along with a winky emoticon.
"I can handle it, I just chose not to actually," she responded fairly blankly.
Then came the apparent attempt to slide into her DMs.
Nando's has since claimed that it was only offering her "hot sauce" (that old chestnut).
"We like to have fun with our customers on Twitter and reward our loyal fans," a spokesperson told The Telegraph. "We wanted to send Elle a bottle of hot sauce in response to her tweet, which is where the reference to ‘handling the heat’ comes from.
"We would never intentionally offend someone and when we realised we may have done so, deleted the tweet. This is not something we would usually do."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments