FILM / On Cinema

John Lyttle
Sunday 19 June 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When Hollywood lost the family audience sometime in the Sixties (TV, bad m-o-o-vies, the shift from the city to the suburbs) it courted the youth vote.

It had to. Teens were the only regular filmgoers; it got the little dears away from Mom and Dad for a spot of heavy petting. The exploitative trash was fun (all those American International pics) even if mainstream youth fare wasn't much cop - ever see the Strawberry Statement? But it did flatter its audience's counter-culture pretensions (the awful Billy Jack flicks) and turn an influential profit (Easy Rider). ER, like its antithesis, The Sound of Music, introduced a new phenomenon, the repeat audience: the long-hairs saw it again and again.

Even after the Sixties' profitable sociological upheavals, the studios kept the faith. Throughout the Seventies and Eighties, cinema in general descended./. rose to the teen audience's level (Star Wars) while the horror genre was hijacked for boys and girls of burgeoning sexuality (Halloween, Terror Train).

Now it's the Nineties and the demographics have changed. The audience is ageing and youth is bored, disengaged, fragmented. Grumpy Old Men and the Generation-X soft soap, Reality Bites, hit American screens within a week of one another and Grumpy Old Men is the hit. It's also the better of the two, but even if it weren't, the fact that today's Clearasil junkies are the children of (M)TV mitigates against big-screen success. With computer games and CD-i, and satellite and cable, movies seem old-fashioned, a broken habit. Hell, contemporary youth barely has reason for getting out of bed - how are they ever going to make it to the box office?

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in