FILM / John Lyttle on cinema

John Lyttle
Wednesday 07 September 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Why does Richard Gere think he's so bloody adorable? He does you know. Whether he's snapping the lid of a jewellery case onto Julia Roberts's gloved hand in Pretty Woman (funny guy]) or posing full frontal in American Gigolo or dancing into Jersualem wearing Pampers in King David, Gere thinks he's the bee's knees, ankles and bicycle clips. His whole demeanour cries out: I am more than a pretty face. I have feelings too and things to say. Behind my Dulux-white smile lies a sensitive, tormented man (cue that moody close-up) and you should love me, body and soul.

The forthcoming Mr Jones (right) couldn't make the message clearer. He's supposed to be playing a manic-depressive but he's just Richard Gere exploring the depths - well, the shallows - of his image (the exploration of image is sometimes known as narcissism). Here's Richard as we foolish creatures want him: up, up and away, kidding around, flashing the grin, wooing the ladies, spending money like its going out of fashion, interrupting an orchestra so he can puckishly conduct.

But is this the 'real' Richard? No. As the movie unreels (unravels, actually) we are privileged to know the man inside. Weeping gently on his first stay in Lena Olin's mental hospital, unafraid to struggle with his demons, walking the streets in pain, feeling betrayed when Olin digs into his past without permission. . . this, the film covertly suggests, is the face behind the PR gloss, the intuitive soul who is pally with the Dalai Lama. Surely his other persona deserves a new name, a name different from the product we call Richard Gere. Surely we should call this person. . . Dick?

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in