Zara pulls ‘tone-deaf’ campaign after criticism over Gaza comparison
Fast fashion giant said it ‘regrets’ misunderstanding over photographs which triggered calls to boycott Zara
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Zara has pulled a controversial ad campaign which some suggested made a mockery of the war in Gaza.
The fashion giant said it “regretted” a misunderstanding about the photographs from its latest atelier campaign “The Jacket”, after they were compared to pictures emerging from war-torn Gaza.
The bloody conflict between Israel and Hamas, which began on 7 October, has killed nearly 18,000 men, women, and children in the beseiged strip.
In some photographs from the campaign, American supermodel Kristen McMenamy was seen holding a mannequin draped in white cloth. In others, she was surrounded by statues with missing limbs and broken plasterboard, or posing inside a coffin-like wooden box.
In a statement shared on Instagram on Tuesday (12 December), Zara clarified the shoot was conceptualised and photographed before the war began, and that the setting was supposed to resemble a sculptor’s studio.
The Inditex-owned company added its “sole purpose” was to present “craftmade garments in an artistic context” but that the images had been removed after “some customers felt offended” by them.
“The campaign, that was conceived in July and photographed in September, presents a series of images of unfinished sculptures in a sculptor’s studio and was created with the sole purpose of showcasing craftmade garments in an artistic context,” the message shared on Zara’s social media accounts read.
“Unfortunately some customers felt offended by these images, which have now been removed, and saw in them something far from what was intended when they were created.
“Zara regrets that misunderstanding and we reaffirm our deep respect towards everyone.”
The hashtag #BoycottZara began trending on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, on Monday (11 December) as the “inhumane” and “tone-deaf” campaign drew sharp criticism online.
Journalist Ahmed Shihab-Eldin commented: “And the award for most tone deaf brand of the year goes to Zara.”
The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority said it received over 110 complaints that the campaign was offensive since it referenced the Israel-Hamas war.
It was also reported that Zara shops in Montreal, Canada, were spray-painted with pro-Palestine slogans after the controversial campaign was released.
Hamas launched an attack on Israel on 7 October, killing 1,200 people.
Israel launched retaliatory attacks, which the Health Ministry in the Hamas-controlled territory says has killed more than 17,700 Palestinians in Gaza, around two-thirds of them women and children.
Additional reporting on wires.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments