Kim Kardashian’s SKIMS accused of ‘greenwashing’ packaging
The brand claims it does not use plastic in its packaging
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Kim Kardashian’s SKIMS has been accused of “greenwashing” over its packaging claims.
A new investigation by the Changing Markets Foundation found “no evidence” to support the environmentally conscious claims made by the popular shapewear and clothing brand.
SKIMS delivers its products to customers in film packaging that reads in bold, black lettering: “I AM NOT PLASTIC.”
“I am compostable made from plants,” it adds. “I will biodegrade in your home compost and in an industrial compost facility.”
However, Changing Markets Foundation noted that the packaging also lists an additional number 4 logo.
The triangular logo, which is a recycling symbol, indicates that the packaging is made from a type 4 plastic, or low-density polyethylene (LDPE).
“While this packaging might decompose in practice, as claimed, it is completely misleading to say that it is not plastic,” the foundation said.
It is not the first time SKIMS has come under scrutiny over its environmental claims.
Good On You, a platform that evaluates the ethical and sustainable practices of brands across the world, awards SKIMS its “We Avoid” – the lowest score.
It said it has awarded the score because SKIMS fails to disclose information about its commitment to sustainability throughout its supply chain.
“SKIMS provides insufficient relevant information about how it reduces its impact on people, the planet, and animals,” the platform said.
“As a shopper, you have the right to know how SKIMS’ production practices impact the world and its inhabitants.
“It’s time SKIMS ‘gets its ass up’ and starts disclosing more information about how, where, and by whom its items are produced, as well as the materials used.”
Changing Markets Foundation’s investigation identified a total of 57 fashion brands that are allagedly “greenwashing” over their packaging.
George Harding-Rolls, campaign Manager at Changing Markets Foundations, commented: “Our latest investigation exposes a litany of misleading and mendacious claims from household names consumers should be able to trust. This is just the tip of the iceberg and it is of crucial importance that regulators take this issue seriously.
“The industry is happy to gloat its green credentials with little substance on the one hand, while continuing to perpetuate the plastic crisis on the other.
“We are calling out greenwashing so the world can see that voluntary action has led to a market saturated with false claims. We must embrace systemic solutions, such as absolute reductions in plastic packaging and mandatory deposit return systems.”
The Independent has contacted SKIMS for comment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments