Alexander Fury: The battle of commerce v creativity in the fashion industry

New York is a city whose fashion output is decried as a triumph of commerce over creativity

Alexander Fury
Wednesday 10 September 2014 06:02 EDT
Comments
Carcelle: 'It's about reliability, quality, style and innovation,' he said of the Vuitton brand
Carcelle: 'It's about reliability, quality, style and innovation,' he said of the Vuitton brand (AFP/Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The spring/summer 2015 shows began on Wednesday in New York: I’m stationed there now. My first show on Monday was Caroline Herrera.

Was I excited? Not as excited as you’d imagine. That’s because, generally, New York is a city whose fashion output is decried as a triumph of commerce over creativity. Where do I stand on that assertion? Well, it’s largely based in fact. There are a few bold exceptions to the rule, such as Joseph Altuzarra, Rodarte, Proenza Schouler and Marc Jacobs. Granted, the latter two aren’t exactly slacking when it comes to commerce. Nevertheless, their output doesn’t feel purely commercially motivated, like the emotionally stunted rail-fillers you see elsewhere.

When “commercial” is used as a pejorative in fashion, it usually means safe, or dull, or expected. There’s no jolt of excitement or anticipation, no newness.

The premature death of former Louis Vuitton CEO Yves Carcelle last week, aged 66, throws this whole ongoing – read: never-ending – creativity and commerce discussion into perspective. Carcelle was the architect behind the ongoing renaissance of Louis Vuitton, CEO when Marc Jacobs was recruited to create the first-ever clothing collection with a Vuitton label attached, moving the name from luxury luggage into the arena of true fashion. Menswear followed, while Jacobs’ collections for womenswear – including genuinely groundbreaking collaborations with the artists Stephen Sprouse, Richard Prince and Takeshi Murakami – raked in praise as well as pounds.

The Vuitton fashion fusion was successful enough to propel the brand into Forbes’ top 10 list of valuable brands, alongside names such as Apple, McDonald’s and Coca-Cola.

So, Vuitton does big business. But for all that commerce, creativity has never, ever taken a back seat – indeed, the creativity of Jacobs, Jones and latterly Nicolas Ghesquière, is the force behind the finance.

Nicolas Ghesquière: 'I ask people to do things they’re not used to doing. I play a little game... But it’s subtle'
Nicolas Ghesquière: 'I ask people to do things they’re not used to doing. I play a little game... But it’s subtle' (Reuters)

Maybe that perfect marriage of opposites is Yves Carcelle’s true legacy? I wish other people could get it quite so right.

For all Vuitton’s commerce, creativity has never taken a back seat

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in