Alexander Fury: Dutch courage

Wear, what, why, when?

Alexander Fury
Sunday 21 July 2013 12:22 EDT
Comments
AMSTERDAM FASHION WEEK SS14
AMSTERDAM FASHION WEEK SS14 (© 2013 TEAM PETER STIGTER )

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Last week I travelled to the Netherlands to participate in Lichting, a graduate event staged as part of Amsterdam Fashion Week.

Dutch fashion, generally, is eye-catching, on the fringes of avant-garde. Its most famous exports are Viktor and Rolf, but you also have the likes of London-based Hawaii-aholic Maarten van der Horst (a fellow Lichting panel member), the crafty Michael van der Ham, or Eighties’ knit-wit Koos Van Den Akker, creator of Bill Cosby’s decidedly loud signature sweaters.

Van der Horst asserted that there was no such thing as “Dutch fashion”. I’m inclined to disagree: there was a thread linking the students we saw at Lichting, selected as the best from the Netherlands’ seven leading art schools. Their fashion, on the whole, was loud, eccentric, occasionally edging towards the insane. None of which is a bad thing. I’m thinking especially of Maartje van Hooij, a student of the Willem de Kooning Academy in Rotterdam, with her bulgy Styrofoam constructions dwarfing the body, smothered in fringe or fabric flowers like high-fashion piñatas. They looked like nothing I’d ever seen before. But somehow, it also seemed quintessentially Dutch.

That assertion vs Van der Horst’s raises an interesting question: what does nationality really mean in fashion? Ignore the clichés of clogs, lederhosen or even our own bearskins and pearly kings and queens. In a global marketplace where anyone can buy anything from anywhere, does where something comes from still make a difference?

In a word, yes. Look at the labels. I don’t mean Prada or Gucci – although I am talking Italian. “Made in Italy” still has a pull that “Made in China” simply doesn’t have. There’s a frisson of luxury. But what about design? London is an all-encompassing fashion capital: we take many a nationality under our wing. Some of London’s finest designers hail from Canada, Greece, even Serbia. But in fashion’s eye they’re all intrinsically British, products of an education system recognised as one of the finest in the world, world-class stars electing to show as part of London Fashion Week. That’s something we can all be proud of. I suppose that’s the importance of nationality in fashion. Fashion stars are feathers in a country’s cap. Pun intended.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in