Alexander Fury: Cool is a tricky, tricksy game. So why bother trying to play it?

Wear, what, why, when? ‘I don’t want to be cool, I want to be fashion!’

Alexander Fury
Sunday 18 August 2013 09:33 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

“Cool” is a weird concept.

It’s supposed to be what we’re all hankering after – how many times can style-guides churn out “10 Ways to Stay Cool” for summer? Or for any season, for that matter. But one can’t help but wonder if that’s really what fashion should be all about?

On the one hand, cool is an indefinable quality. You either have it, or you don’t. Look at James Dean and Marlon Brando in shades and leather perfecto jackets. Now look at Cliff Richard in the “Wired for Sound” video. Minus the roller skates, the fashion formula is the same.

So why do the former look so right and the latter so very, very wrong?

Perhaps because, contrary to fashion’s assertions, cool has very little to do with the clothes you put on your back. Of course, they can help: it’s easier to look cool in a leather jacket than a taffeta prom dress. But if everyone’s wearing a leather jacket and trying to look cool, does that negate its cachet completely? Possibly. That’s why east London hipsters began wearing items dragged from the charity shop pound-bin, such as gem-encrusted Christmas sweaters. If you can look cool in garments that are the nadir of naffness, it emphasises that the quality is with you. It’s the opposite of clothes making the man.

But then, of course, cool is cyclical. The naff sweater itself became cool. People began buying them to try to look cool. Which became uncool. Cool is a tricky, tricksy game.

Personally, I’m not willing to play it. That’s because I hate fashion that tries too hard. Look at those Givenchy sweatshirts, splashed with oh-so-serious, crypto-religious iconography. They’re cool, right? Probably. But, frankly, they’re not much fun.

Which is the main issue: it’s difficult to look cool and have a good time. Anna Dello Russo, a woman who always looks like she’s having a party in her bejewelled pants, once stated “I don’t want to be cool, I want to be fashion!” There’s a lesson to live your life by.

What Anna means, of course, is that she wants to have a good time in gold lamé rather than hang out in black trying to look nihilistic. Besides which, all the best fashion, I reckon, isn’t cool at all. No-one ever looked cool in Christian Lacroix couture.

But God, they all had a great time.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in