Chanel criticised for casting 16-year-old model in new campaign
'She should have a lunch bag, she is a kid!'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.As Cindy Crawford’s only daughter, a thriving modelling career for Kaia Gerber was probably always going to be in the pipeline.
At just 16 years old, the lithe-limbed teen has already become a household name in the fashion industry, walking for almost every major label around, including Saint Laurent, Prada, Burberry and Alexander Wang.
However, it seems that even being born into fashion royalty won’t immunise you against controversy, as Gerber’s latest campaign for Chanel has been criticised online by fans for being "too sexy".
Photographed by creative director Karl Lagerfeld for the luxury French brand’s new handbag campaign, the young model poses alongside one of the label’s iconic “Gabrielle” handbags, which takes its namesake from founder Gabrielle “Coco” Chanel, in whose Parisian apartment Gerber is pictured in.
Reclining on a chaise in the infamous 31 Rue Cambon apartment as part of the spring/summer 2018 campaign, Gerber’s thigh-skimming skirt has caused some critics to label the imagery “provocative” and “inappropriate”.
“She should have a lunch bag, she is a kid!" one Facebook user wrote.
“Seriously? A 16 year old? What exactly are you promoting?” another added.
Others suggested that Chanel herself would not approve of the casting:
“It is not doubt that she is a beautiful young lady… too young, too barely dressed,” one person wrote, “I am just curious what will be Gabrielle Chanel’s reaction.??!!”
With prices ranging from £2,490 to £3,990, some have lambasted the brand for casting a 16-year-old in a campaign promoting such a premium product that few teens would actually be able to afford.
However, some fans defended Chanel’s choice of casting, claiming there was “nothing wrong” with the imagery.
“She’s not naked or doing something provocative in a sexual way,” one fan wrote, “she’s a teen enjoying what she loves to do ... and making name for herself ... she is the next REAL SUPERMODEL!”
Others lauded the campaign as “beautiful” and “absolutely stunning,” with some pointing out that a lot of models working today start aged 16 or even younger.
The Independent has contacted Chanel for comment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments