Kim Kardashian wearing Marilyn Monroe’s dress was a ‘big mistake’, says Bob Mackie

The American fashion designer drew the original sketch for the Jean-Louis gown

Saman Javed
Tuesday 17 May 2022 04:43 EDT
Comments
Bob Mackie drew the original sketch for the iconic Jean-Louis dress
Bob Mackie drew the original sketch for the iconic Jean-Louis dress (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

American fashion designer Bob Mackie has criticised Ripley’s Believe It or Not! museum for allowing Kim Kardashian to wear Marilyn Monroe’s iconic Jean-Louis dress to the Met Gala.

The SKIMS mogul made headlines earlier this month when she arrived on the steps of the Metropolitan Museum of Art wearing the same form-fitting nude dress Monroe donned to serenade US President John F Kennedy on his 45th birthday in 1962.

Mackie, who drew the original sketch for the dress while working as an assistant to the French costume designer, told Entertainment Weekly that he believes “nobody else” should have been seen in the dress, as it was made for Monroe.

“I thought it was a big mistake,” Mackie said. “[Marilyn] was a goddess. A crazy goddess, but a goddess.

“She was just fabulous. Nobody photographs like that. And it was done for her. It was designed for her. Nobody else should be seen in that dress.”

Mackie recalled designing the garment in a recent interview with Vogue ahead of the Met Gala, disclosing that he had “no idea” where Monroe planned to wear the dress until he saw the photographs in a newspaper.

“Marilyn looked amazing and accomplished exactly what she intended to,” he said.

“Fox Studios would not let her wear anything too revealing in films, because of the previous nude calendar scandal. And she didn’t really care, because she had already been fired.

“Her figure was at its peak, the dress was a classic shape of fashion at the time.”

While Kardashian quickly changed into a replica after posing for pictures on the Met Gala red carpet, the dress’s brief outing sparked concern among historians.

Sarah Scaturro, a chief conservator at the Cleveland Museum of Art and formerly a conservator at the Met’s Costume Institute said that it could set a precedent for the treatment of other historic costumes.

“I’m frustrated because it sets back what is considered professional treatment for historic costume,” Scaturro told The LA Times.

In 1986, the Costume Society of America passed a resolution that would prohibit wearing objects in collections.

Its mission states: CSA encourages persons and organizations charged with the preservation of costume to prohibit the wearing or modeling of articles intended for preservation.”

Scaturro added: “My worry is that colleagues in historic costume collections are now going to be pressured by important people to let them wear garments.”

Others also worried that the dress could have been damaged. The gown was sold to Ripley’s for $4.8 million (£3.8 million) in 2016 and holds the record for the most expensive dress sold at auction.

It is stored by Ripley’s in a dark vault, which is controlled at 68 degrees Fahrenheit and 40-50 per cent humidity.

Kardashian said she was “extremely respectful to the dress and what it means to American history”.

“I would never want to sit in it or eat in it or have any risk of any damage to it and I won’t be wearing the kind of body makeup I usually do,” she told Vogue.

“Everything had to be specifically timed and I had to practice walking up the stairs.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in