Dopey, happy and healthy

Seventy per cent of doctors support the use of cannabis in medicine. Francesca Beard investigates

Francesca Beard
Saturday 15 March 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Public fears about crack, E and smack have reached such a pitch that marijuana seems relatively cuddly - particularly given the increasing acceptance of its beneficial medical properties among doctors and scientists. Perhaps that's why Howard Marks, Oxford graduate, high-class drug smuggler and former inmate of Terre Haute Penitentiary, Indiana, has chosen the unlikely setting of Norwich to launch his campaign.

He will be standing in the general election on a legalise cannabis ticket. And, in an effort to reach a wider audience, he has got together with a London-based group of musicians to record a dance track entitled "TechnoPolitical Party Broadcast". Sample vocals from Howard "Mr Nice" Marks include "Why do we criminalise our youth and expect them to respect our laws?"; "Prohibition is a failed social experiment"; and "This government has declared war on its own population."

Cannabis' calmative properties were well known in the 19th century (according to medical records, Queen Victoria used it to ease menstrual cramps). In fact, cannabis was only removed from the NHS lists in 1966, becoming the nation's evil corrupter of youth and demon drug in 1971, when it was officially declared of no medical use. Doctors, scientists and sufferers believe that some effects of conditions such as glaucoma, cancer chemotherapy, multiple sclerosis, Aids, migraines, epilepsy, depression and pruritus can be alleviated with the use of cannabis.

Those who have tried the drug purely recreationally will have already experienced its muscle-relaxant and appetite-arousing effects (these can, of course, counteract one another, as anyone who has suffered a raging attack of the munchies and simultaneously lacked the energy to dial for pizza will testify). But cannabis also has a powerful anti-nausea action. However, any benefits it may offer will not be effective when it is taken in conjunction with alcohol. (Of course, the same applies to flu remedies, codeine and antibiotics.)

But what, you ask, about the paranoia? My hair is falling out/people are avoiding me/I'm going to die? A disadvantage, it is true, but one shared by drugs currently prescribed for cancer, Aids and multiple sclerosis, which can have hallucinatory properties.

A Channel 4 survey in March 1995 found that 70 per cent of doctors thought that cannabis should be available on prescription. Unfortunately, there is an inherent problem with publicly supporting its use, since this is tantamount to admitting you are a criminal.

Since its exile from social acceptability, hemp has had a passionate underground following. But the conspiracy theorists, stoned slackers and shipwrecked hippies have a surprising amount of support among informed, so-called responsible members of society. For many people, the criminalisation of hemp is a crime against logic. And among those informed, responsible members of society you can include the 43 members of Parliament who, in a recent ITN poll, declared that they had had experience of "soft" drugs.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in