Dear Lord Justice Hoffmann: A music critic calls upon the Arts Council's arbiter to make a stand and refuse to destroy two of London's orchestras

Gillian Widdicombe
Thursday 02 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

This morning, in strict confidence, you will report to the Arts Council's music panel which one of three orchestras should share with the London Symphony the honour of higher public funding while the remaining two suffer the humiliation of having their subsidies dropped.

I bet you wish you'd never accepted this nasty, divisive and destructive brief. You must realise there is so little to choose between the London Philharmonic and the Philharmonia that no choice should be made. The LPO has a substantial advantage, being officially resident at the South Bank, which means it receives more public subsidy; but in practice this has proved a poisoned chalice, provoking boardroom crises, sacked management and a horrid year for the orchestra's music director, Franz Welser-Mst.

Even the fact that the Arts Council did not endorse the South Bank's choice of the LPO as the super orchestra, but asked you to chair this committee, shows how indvidious such choices are. This is the most unnecessary arts politics muddle in years, and musicians will go on telling tales of Hoffmann, whatever the outcome.

I hope your deliberations have included precedents for what makes a great orchestra. You should have heard of Sidney Sax's session band, to which the best players in London flocked when Sid called. Sid would have run a mile at your committee's talk of outreach and education.

Then there was the founding of the Academy of St Martin in the Fields by a second fiddler who wanted to play without a conductor. And don't forget John Eliot Gardiner's English Baroque Soloists, who have won numerous international awards in the past five years thanks to the sometimes charming, sometimes intolerable Gardiner. Personally, I'd forget the 'super symphony orchestra' and increase the peanuts given to Gardiner's ensemble so they can give more performances in the UK and fewer abroad.

I suppose the Arts Council asked you to chair this orchestral hit squad because you did a brilliant bit of arbitration when orchestras which formerly played at the South Bank objected to Nicholas Snowman, chief executive of the South Bank Centre, saying they could no longer use his halls as a garage. And I dare say you were tempted to follow in the footsteps of your old mentor, Lord Goodman. But he earned the nickname 'Blessed Arnold' because he believed in fixing things, and is inclined to take the positive line.

I can't imagine Lord Goodman approving of your role in the current debcle. He would be the first to say that such draconian measures are inappropriate, and would regret the Arts Council's fondness for setting its clients at each other's throats.

Yes, perhaps it is time for the Royal Philharmonic to leave the table - its subsidy of pounds 400,000 is a mere 7 per cent of its income. However, these things should be done gradually, in a climate of mutual respect. So please throw the case out of court, Lord Justice, and advise the music panel to think again, perhaps funding projects rather than institutions.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in