Employers judge applicants’ social class in just seven words – and the posher you sound, the more likely they are to hire you

‘Even during the briefest interactions, a person’s speech patterns shape the way people perceive them’

Olivia Petter
Thursday 24 October 2019 07:17 EDT
Comments
(Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Interviewers judge job candidates based on their socioeconomic status seconds after they start speaking, new research suggests.

According to a study conducted by Yale University, which is to be published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, hiring managers make instant assumptions about a person’s social class based on how they pronounce just seven words.

The study found that the higher an employer deems an applicant’s social class, the more likely they are to view them as competent for the job compared to those of lower status.

The employer is also more likely to recommend a higher starting salary for someone they perceive to be of a higher socioeconomic status, the research claims.

To conduct the study, lead author Michael Kraus, assistant professor of organisational behaviour at Yale University, and his team recruited 20 candidates from different social backgrounds and invited them to be interviewed for a laboratory manager role.

The candidates were asked to describe themselves on a recording, which was then played to 274 hiring managers who, without access to the applicants’ CVs, were asked to make judgements on their professional capabilities, social class and assign them a starting salary.

“We rarely talk explicitly about social class, and yet, people with hiring experience infer competence and fitness based on socioeconomic position estimated from a few second of an applicant’s speech,” Kraus said.

“If we want to move to a more equitable society, then we must contend with these ingrained psychological processes that drive our early impressions of others.

“Despite what these hiring tendencies may suggest, talent is not found solely among those born to rich or well-educated families. Policies that actively recruit candidates from all levels of status in society are best positioned to match opportunities to the people best suited for them.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in