Chess

William Hartston
Wednesday 11 June 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The proliferation in chess magazines and newspaper columns of "White to Play and Win" positions certainly helps to sharpen one's combinational skills, but also serves to give a false view of reality. For in real life, games are lost by blunders or won by slow attrition rather than being decided by brilliant finishes.

What we need to redress the balance is a steady diet of sacrificial combinations that went wrong - attacks launched in a spirit of brilliance only to be shot down in flames. In that spirit, today's position sets the scene for a "White to Play and Lose" puzzle. It comes from a match between Viswanathan Anand (playing Black in this game) and Miguel Illescas currently in progress in Leon, Spain.

White has a good set of the ingredients typical of an imminent combination: his bishops are both on threatening diagonals; one knight occupies a good central outpost; and there may even be a chance to cause disruption by playing d5.

A normal continuation here might be 1.Bg5. Instead, Illescas decided to bring his rook into the attack without delay and played 1.Rd3 Nc4 2.Rg3??! (the real beginning of his losing combination) 2 ... Qxd4 3.Bh6??! White is tempted by such lines as 3

A brilliant interference move and the crowning point of White's combination. What a pity it's all complete nonsense. 6 ... Bxd5! 7.Qxe5. Now White threatens to win with 8.Rxh7+ against Which Black has no defence ... except 7 ... Be4! after which White resigned immediately. He finishes at least a piece behind.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in