Catcalling negatively impacts how women think about themselves, finds study
The participants reported being targeted once every two days
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.For most women, being catcalled on the street has become an unfortunate part of every day life.
But, ask the ‘bros’ on social media and women are just imagining it, asking for it or should even feel lucky.
While critics and nescient lads alike could argue that these cases are rare, a new study is helping to prove otherwise.
Published in the British Journal of Social Psychology, research by the University of Melbourne in Australia is thought to be the first of its kind to capture just how common sexual harassment is in the lives of women and to show the possible impact this can have on how women think about themselves.
The study saw 81 women, with an average age of 22, first asked to complete a number of surveys, which measured their self-esteem and personality. They were also shown examples of different forms of objectification including gazes and comments.
Then, over the course of a week these women responded to questions via an app they had downloaded to their phone. In total, three questions were sent, 10 times a day, at random intervals between 10am and midnight.
The questions included whether they’d been thinking about how they look to other people, if they had been target by any sexually objectifying events, and if they had witnessed anyone else being targeted by these behaviors. This final questions also included an extra option of “media image/video,” so it could capture sexual objectification in the media.
Shockingly, the results found that women reported being the target of a sexually objectifying event once every two days.
55 per cent of these events consisted of a gaze, 11 per cent were cat calls or wolf whistles, ten per cent were sexual remarks and four per cent were touching or fondling.
The women also reported witnessing sexual objectification of another women on average 1.35 times a day. Unsurprisingly, two thirds of these instances had been portrayed in the media but there were many occasions of other women experiencing this in real life.
Perhaps the most startling discovery though was that both being personally targeted or witnessing others being objectified was associated with a “substantial increase” in “self-objectification”, proving that these instances of sexual harassment can have a negative impact on the way women think about themselves.
While the study accepts that there are some limitations in its research – people’s perceptions of what ‘objectifying’ means and the fact that they couldn’t distinguish if the person doing the objectifying was male or female – the findings are undisputable.
For women, not just in Melbourne but all over the world, this kind of sexual harassment is very real.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments