Budget: Inheritance/Capital Gains Tax
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.EACH YEAR, reports of the widespread reform of inheritance and capital gains tax prove much exaggerated and this year was no exception - if anything, the reverse.
From April, estates worth less than pounds 231,000 will escape inheritance tax, after the threshold is lifted by pounds 8,000.
Similarly the ceiling on capital gains tax (CGT) is lifted from pounds 6,800 to pounds 7,100, and in future it will be levied at either 20 per cent or 40 per cent. Following the introduction of a new 10 per cent starting rate, the 23 per cent rate is to be abolished.
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, has however, put in place measures to prevent wealthy people from passing substantial property to the next generation, following the House of Lords ruling in favour of Lady Ingram.
To protect the family estate from inheritance tax, she devised a complex deal which involved giving her property to her solicitor, while placing the freehold in a trust for her children, and obtaining a lease for herself.
The legal loophole exploited by these arrangements has now been closed. Less imaginative attempts to give away a family home while continuing to live there, would always have fallen foul of the Inland Revenue, unless the former owner paid a commercial rent.
Teresa Hunter
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments