Bridge

Alan Hiron
Tuesday 08 October 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An habitual rubber bridge player, pressed into service to make up the numbers in a recent duplicate event, recorded one of two top scores by playing to maximise his chances of success regardless of possible overtricks. The idea worked splendidly whenever the adverse cards lay badly. Consider this deal.

South opened 1# and North responded 1!. Usually South's rebid was 2NT (raised to game by North) but our rubber man, characteristically and practically, chose to rebid 3NT. It did not matter here, for the final contract was almost universal.

West led 2J and (in case his partner had led from 2A,J,10,9,x) East played his king. It would not have been a good idea to hold off because of the danger of a switch to a major suit, so declarer won immediately.

The contract was in no danger unless the diamonds divided 4-0 and there would be at least ten tricks if they broke 2-2. With the possible overtricks in mind, most of the field started by cashing #A. Now East had two sure tricks in the suit and there was no possible recovery.

So, how did our rubber bridge specialist fare? Realising that, although he could not cope if West held all the missing diamonds, he could manage quite well if they were all with East, he led #4 from hand at trick two! East could win this but, with two quick entries to dummy, the rest of the suit could be picked up without further loss. And that meant nine tricks and a near top score.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in