Bottom of the spending class : LETTER
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In the furore about funding teachers pay, we should accept Margaret Thatcher's dictum: "We can only have the services we can afford." Surely, this is self-evidently true. The issue is simple - is the education expenditure what we can or should afford?
The answer is also simple. We ought to devote to education what our international competitors afford - i.e. what percentage of their GDP goes to education? The evidence is damning as Britain is now bottom of this international league table for those whom comparable data is available.
For example:
Canada spends 7.2% of its GDP
Denmark, Finland 6.9%
Holland, Norway 6.6.%
Germany, Ireland 6.2%
Belgium 6.1%
Luxembourg 6.0%
France, Sweden, US 5.7%
Austria 5.6%
Switzerland 5.1%
Spain 5.0%
Japan, Portugal 4.9%
United Kingdom 4.7%
(source: US Dept Commerce, 1993, Statistical Abstracts of the USA, 13th edition)
Under Edward Heath, we used to spend 6.2 per cent! Is it surprising that those at the front-line of education are beginning to feel demoralised as class sizes and demands rise, resources decline, despite all the rhetoric of the importance of investing in the future? We must reverse this dangerous trend before it is too late.
Yours sincerely,
Colin Pritchard
Department of Social Work Studies
University of Southampton
Southampton
15 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments