Centrist Dad

There is no better TV sport than snooker... and none so hard to play

Glued to his set for the World Championship, Will Gore tries to dissuade his son from taking a trip to the local snooker hall

Sunday 30 April 2023 05:30 EDT
Comments
Luca Brecel at the table against Ronnie O’Sullivan
Luca Brecel at the table against Ronnie O’Sullivan (Getty)

Most professional athletes make their chosen sport look easy, if not effortless.

When I watch Jimmy Anderson bowl against Steve Smith, it appears simple – but I’m very conscious that they have remarkable cricket skills. Likewise, when Jon Rahm hits a long iron to the middle of a tricky green, or when Marcus Rashford or Alessia Russo bang in glorious goals, I know their sporting ability far outweighs mine.

And yet, give me a cricket ball and I’ll more or less pitch it on a length; a golf club, and I’ll take a decent swing. And while I might not last a full 90 minutes on a football pitch, I would – at least in a game at the local park – probably be able to knock around a few passes with reasonable accuracy.

In short, there are many sports which a great many people can make a reasonable fist of. We might not get near pro level, but with a decent eye, fair balance and a bit of mobility, playing games like cricket and football is perfectly possible.

There is one sport, however, that is different. Ironically, on the telly it looks easier than most: little physicality, no great time pressure, and regular chances to sit down. The players do their thing with apparent tranquillity. But should you ever decide to have a go yourself, it’s akin to being asked to park a car with a blindfold on.

To be quite clear, snooker is a beast of a game. And it’s worse if you have successfully played its simpler cousin, pool. You’ll then at least know how to hold a cue, and will understand the rudiments of angle and spin. Yet even to approach a full-sized snooker table is to be taken aback. What seems on the TV to be a neat little rectangle of green turns out in fact to be a vast field of smooth cloth. It would be easier to pitch a tent on it than to put together a meaningful score.

Snooker loopy he may be, but I can’t fault the ambition. And given my own record on the green baize, his first frame will almost certainly end in victory

On the few occasions I’ve had a go, the results have been nightmarish. Chas and Dave may have chirpily sung about potting the reds, then screwing back for the yellow, green, brown, blue, pink and black; but in my experience, sinking a single red is an achievement. If the cue ball ends up being vaguely in position to take on a colour, it’s by complete fluke. I feel as if the game shouldn’t be impossible, and yet in any meaningful way, it absolutely is.

As a child of the 1980s, I got into snooker as a spectator during its halcyon days. I used to watch it on the box with my grandmother, who had a soft spot for Jimmy White, and who thought Alex Higgins was a disgrace. I was a Steve Davis fan: he was never really as boring as he was portrayed to be, but all the players back then had to have a reductive personality to suit the marketeers.

It still feels faintly absurd that 18 million people tuned in to watch Davis’s World Championship final against Dennis Taylor in 1985, but I suppose those were simpler times. Watching this year’s World Championship, it’s clear that the quality in the game is as good as it ever was – perhaps even better – even if the interest from the public has declined. And the top players still make it look easy.

My son was aghast when Ronnie O’Sullivan lost seven frames in a row to be knocked out in his quarter-final against Luca Brecel. He tends to have a soft spot for the greats in every sport, despite being a Tottenham fan, so once the Rocket was out, he wasn’t sure who to root for.

He’s keen to have a go himself though, buoyed by his success on the mini pool table we got him for Christmas. He has a peculiar cueing action, but twice on Thursday he knocked in five balls in a row to beat me on the black. Never mind that a snooker table is about 12 times bigger, or that he’d be significantly shorter than even a reduced-sized cue, he definitely fancies his chances of ending up at the Crucible Theatre.

I’ve tried in vain to explain that it’s a difficult game in real life but he’s demanding I find out where the nearest club is. Snooker loopy he may be, but I can’t fault the ambition. And given my own record on the green baize, his first frame will almost certainly end in victory – albeit, probably several hours after it begins.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in