The Sketch: Britishness: a God-given right to muddle through
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.At the Lords debate on Britishness we had speeches from noble Afro-Brits, Indo-Brits, Islamo-Brits, Euro-Brits and even a couple of Anglo-Brits. We all have multiple identities these days. It's something to do with Gordon Brown's attempt to include himself in the "one of us" category at election time. It's working well so far, you notice.
Tory Lord Taylor gave us a series of propositions about Britishness. It's about "shaking hands, not shaking fists", and "building bridges, not walls" "pulling together, not pulling apart". These are the things politicians say. But is that what being British is about? Are our hooligans not British? What about our fox hunters? What about our fist-shaking, wall-building BNP? Whatever else they are, they're British.
Lord Parekh told us that there was no transcendental British essence and that identity was a political project. That sounds plausible, but nauseating. On Gordon's political definition, a Briton sounds very like a New Labour supporter.
It's an impossible subject for politicians. They have to produce a sanitary, health-and-safety definition of what it is to be British. In the half dozen speeches I heard, no one even mentioned the Queen. Too controversial.
As a country that's had very limited immigration for most of its history our experience of integrating foreigners has been on our – that is, English – terms. Rapid, mass immigration is new and it bewilders our intellectuals.
"Education is the answer,' it's often said. But as Baroness Cox related, that depends what's on the syllabus. In the 1970s she had to contend with crypto-Marxo-Brits whose idea of education was inculcating "shame, guilt and abhorrence" of British history. And that we are even now reaping the harvest of those days.
And bloody religious revolution can be a passion of highly educated people; it ain't the result of ignorance and poverty.
For once the Church of England has something useful to tell us. The Bishop of Norwich recommended the practice which is profoundly, possibly transcendentally, British: the concept of "muddling through". He said it was a practice on which "the Church of England has much to offer". Amen.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments