Obituary: Professor Ernest Gellner

Professor David-Hillel Ruben
Wednesday 08 November 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In the unique and idiosyncratic intellectual melange that constituted Ernest Gellner, philosophy too had its part to play, writes Professor David-Hillel Ruben [further to the obituary by Professor Chris Hann, 8 November].

Gellner's philosophical contribution might be thought of in two ways. First, there was the well-known early intervention against ordinary language philosophy. In Words and Things, he sought to expose the excesses of the methodology then practised in much of the Anglo-American philosophical world. Targeting chiefly Wittgenstein and his Oxford followers, Gellner, in that book and in his influential Cause and Meaning in the Social Sciences, attacked what he saw as the idealist implications and consequences of such a style of philosophising, which he regarded as unacceptable for the practice of the social sciences. In this, he was in the company of other philosophers at the London School of Economics, who stood apart from the philosophical fashions of the time, and defended a quite distinctive point of view from the environs of Houghton Street. He incurred the displeasure of the Oxford dons; it is said that Gilbert Ryle, then editor of Mind, the leading philosophy journal in the UK, refused to allow a review of Words and Things to be published in its pages.

Secondly, there was that completely idiosyncratic style of social philosophising, so characteristic of Gellner's main works: an exciting blend of the empirical and the philosophical, the descriptive and the normative, a middle-level theorising less abstract than that of mainstream philosophy, but far more speculative and bold than that produced by orthodox social scientists. Gellner thought of this as "social philosophy", a term without an otherwise fixed and clear meaning in philosophy.

Gellner was an eclectic, who combined many social sciences into a single systematic approach. His social philosophy was continuous with, and grew naturally from, the tensions and problems to which this way of doing things gave rise. Social philosophy has inspired countless numbers of students, and Gellner was its main practitioner.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in