Martin Newell
The pop poet and writer responds to the attack made by Barney Hoskyns on novelists and journalists for using their own lives as subject matter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.If people are buying autobiographies and memoirs by journalists and columnists, perhaps it says more about the appalling state of the modern novel than it does about how bad such confessional writing is. I would much rather read about Tony Parsons's struggles as a single dad than have to plough through Brett Easton Ellis's gore or Salman Rushdie's impenetrable preciousness.
If people are buying autobiographies and memoirs by journalists and columnists, perhaps it says more about the appalling state of the modern novel than it does about how bad such confessional writing is. I would much rather read about Tony Parsons's struggles as a single dad than have to plough through Brett Easton Ellis's gore or Salman Rushdie's impenetrable preciousness.
Barney Hoskyn's singeing attack on the "self-fixated pseudo-literature" of Parsons, Nick Hornby and Paul Morley is ill-judged. All three write very well and in a fine tradition which stretches back to Defoe and Swift, if not to Juvenal. They follow that first rule of writing: to write about what you know.
If these authors are popular and sell, it is because people want to read their stuff. We can bandy terms for their genre as much as we like, but their tales are what used to be known as human interest stories and, as such, have currency. They also have the ring of truth, which is refreshing for those who are fed up with the transatlantic fantasy factory.
What is wrong with people writing well or humourously about their lives? What would Barney have us do? Remove Spike Milligan, Gerald Durrell, Dirk Bogarde and James Herriot from our bookshelves?
Ah, but the gauche and sinful media splashes attendant upon the publications of the New Memoirs: does Barney think Dickens, Wilde or the Brontës would have turned down an Arena special or Start the Week? Writers were once invisible creatures who kept mum about their private lives, but many great writers also lived in obscurity and died in poverty. In an age where traffic wardens, airport staff and vets have documentaries made about them, what's wrong with writers getting a slice of the action?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments