Katharine Ainger

The co-editor of the'New Internationalist', a participant in the Prague demonstrations, responds to a leading article arguing that the protests failed

Monday 02 October 2000 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Independent labelled those who protested against globalisation in Prague "economic illiterates". The imposition of an identical economic model into every corner of the planet is not some immutable law of nature, but a planned process of unaccountable power concentration that must be challenged. When you have a deficit of democracy on this colossal scale, you get the scenes in Prague.

The Independent labelled those who protested against globalisation in Prague "economic illiterates". The imposition of an identical economic model into every corner of the planet is not some immutable law of nature, but a planned process of unaccountable power concentration that must be challenged. When you have a deficit of democracy on this colossal scale, you get the scenes in Prague.

Delegates raised their heads above the parapets to see the faces of real people.

They were Indian peasant movements fighting against big dams. They were Italian anarchists in white suits, armed with balloons. They were marginalised indigenous peoples from countries such as Colombia and Bolivia. They were refusing a single economic model and demanding diverse, people-centred alternatives.

The media look at this diversity and call it a miscellany. They can see the variety of causes, but not the connections between them. It is the protesters who have grasped the systemic nature of globalisation's impacts: job insecurity, lowered labour standards and destroyed livelihoods of farmers.

Debt relief is hampered not by "bureaucratic sclerosis" but because the G7 states profit from debt. The protesters know their power lies in making new coalitions that aim for the heart of the hydra, the globalisation process itself. In Prague they strengthened the voices of the poor outside the conference hall and the votes of the Southern countries inside, too.

The face-off between popular power and transnational capital is the defining story of our time. As the globalisation critic Susan George has observed: "There are some who get it. Some who don't. And some who'll never know what hit them."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in