Belinda Phipps

The chief executive officer ofthe National Childbirth Trust responds to an article by Brian Viner, who suggested that the trust advises against pain relief in childbirth

Thursday 12 October 2000 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Along with Brian Viner ("How long has Kate Winslet been pregnant?", 5 October), the National Childbirth Trust wishes Kate a very special and memorable birth, in accordance with her wishes. Indeed, if she were to attend an NCT antenatal class (as anyone can), she would undoubtedly come away with the abiding impression that, when it comes to the birth of her own baby, the only opinion that really matters is hers.

Along with Brian Viner ("How long has Kate Winslet been pregnant?", 5 October), the National Childbirth Trust wishes Kate a very special and memorable birth, in accordance with her wishes. Indeed, if she were to attend an NCT antenatal class (as anyone can), she would undoubtedly come away with the abiding impression that, when it comes to the birth of her own baby, the only opinion that really matters is hers.

Some women want least to try to have a delivery with minimal intervention if at all possible, while others say they'll probably start screaming for an epidural the second their waters break. The point is that the function of NCT antenatal classes is not to make pregnant women feel like failures if they express a desire to have pain relief handy "just in case", any more than it is to promulgate caesarean sections as de rigueur for busy executives with meetings to attend.

As for being "gung-ho about rejecting pain relief", well, one thing the NCT is gung-ho about is that expectant mums be given the opportunity to decide for themselves what's best for them, based on the best information available. We would no more "brainwash" Kate into eschewing any form of pain relief than suggest she pops over to Hampstead Heath and gives birth behind a tree, Native American style, when her time comes.

The NCT is all about enabling women to make informed choices about the kind of birth experience they wish to have, and to support them, wherever practicable, in making their wishes come true. We have heard too many horror stories from traumatised and disillusioned new mothers who were not given the information they needed when it really mattered, to give up on that principle. And the camomile tea is optional!

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in