Simon Kelner: Sent with a loving kiss – but what's the subtext?

 

Simon Kelner
Tuesday 04 October 2011 05:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A male friend of mine sent me a text yesterday. Not the most remarkable event, I grant you, particularly in an age when people would much rather text or email than expend the energy on actually talking. But the point is this: his text was a simple, perfunctory message about playing table tennis, but he signed off with an "x".

Do I really want a kiss from a mate of mine? Does he really mean it? And when I reply sans tendresse, does that make me appear unfriendly? This started me thinking about how the modern world's etiquette can be very tricky to negotiate for those of a certain age.

Like me, for example. (A friend of mine once said there are three ages of man: youth, middle age, and – "you look well!" I have now reached the point in my life when people tell me how well I look.) The point is that I don't know the rules about the "x" suffix to a text. I am always pleased to receive one, and I sometimes send one – not usually to my male friends, so what does that say about me? – but I worry about whether it's inappropriate, or whether I've added one on a previous message, and now, if I send an "x"-less text, will the recipient read something into that?

A letter sealed with a kiss used to mean something. (Do you remember personal letters, by the way? Lovely things to send and receive.) But what the text has done is to turn a kiss effectively into a full stop. My advice: where friends are concerned – male or female – use it always, or use it never. That way, you're never going to confuse or upset. And on the subject of text etiquette, anyone over the age of 30 – and I'm being generous here – should leave the abbreviated language to the youngsters. After all, it belongs to them. I have a friend who's coming up to pensionable ago whose texts are full of "cul8r" and "gr8" and even "lol". It's every bit as wrong as a grown man (who is not actually a rapper) wearing a baseball cap back to front.

Here's a couple of other tips to stay polite and switched on. When you say you are switching your mobile off, don't just put it on vibrate. That's not switching it off! And, if you insist on tweeting, don't say anything ironic. Twitter only does face value, not irony, and those 140 characters might easily be taken the wrong way. 21st Century etiquette? It's a nightmare. Let me kno wat u think. C u tmrw x

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in