Simon Carr: Our smug Chancellor finds the currency crisis rickly amusing

 

Simon Carr
Thursday 03 November 2011 14:22 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

George Osborne was so relaxed, so smiley; even the subcutaneous sneer had sunk out of sight.

Alistair Darling asked him if this bailout thing was proper money or the sort of "sophisticated financial instrument that caused the trouble in the first place".

"It's a sophisticated financial instrument," the Chancellor smiled. And everyone smiled.

If you saw him like this at a party you'd say it was a triumph of the pharmacologist's art. No, it's the euro-quake giving him this ease and poise. A monetary crisis is the Chancellor's equivalent of ecstasy.

He's loving it. It's a perfect storm for George in that it's not his fault, it's a distraction from his domestic difficulties, he can assign the blame to it for any local failures of growth and it's all about his opponents coming to grief in a way he always said they would.

But can he control the momentum it's given his own sceptics? Bill Cash pulled out their Big Bazooka: if fiscal union happens, "in what way does that not represent fundamental change?" And therefore require a referendum.

Cameron's position is that if no powers are transferred to Brussels then no vote. Will that hold?

Could the Chancellor assure Christopher Chope the Financial Transaction Tax was "dead in the water"? Nein. George, he says, wouldn't let us be sucked into that.

But Bernard Jenkin has pointed out Brussels can put VAT on all financial transactions. We'd have no veto. Even when the project is tottering it has an awesome reach.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in