Dara O'Briain: The law is gagging scientists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Defending a libel case is complex, time-consuming and extremely expensive. At the last general election, all three parties promised large-scale reform of the law – the first since 1843 – to protect public debate and freedom of expression. The Government published a Defamation Bill earlier this year, yet, nothing has changed.
I got involved in campaigning for libel reform because scientists and science writers were being sued for contributing to the evidential debates that we need them to have; Simon Singh writing on chiropractors' claims to treat childhood illnesses, Ben Goldacre about vitamin tablets promoted as a cure for Aids, the cardiologist Peter Wilmshurst discussing concerns about a heart device. The Government promised reforms would protect people like them. But winning a case can still cost three years of your life and £1.5m. Such costs have reduced the law to a high-stakes game of poker.
The libel reform Bill the Government is working on doesn't go far enough in protecting scientists, from being sued. The only "public-interest" defence is the Reynolds defence, unsuitable for scientific debate, consumer groups and in particular, those who publish on the internet. It simply doesn't work for organisations like Mumsnet, Which? or patient groups.
Libel can still be used to chill public debate and as reputation management by huge corporations.
The Libel Reform Campaign's calls are supported by consumer groups including Citizens Advice and Which?, by human rights NGOs and newspapers.
While the libel laws are complicated, the issues aren't: do we want a society where people don't speak out, or one where free and open discussion is possible? We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to improve our libel laws; it is in all our interests that this is done properly.
The Libel Reform Campaign is a coalition of three charities, Sense About Science, Index on Censorship and English PEN, with support from 60,000 individuals. libelreform.org
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments