Archie Bland: The bumper sticker approach to politics can work

Wednesday 02 May 2012 04:56 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Joe Biden's line was one of the better ones to emerge from the US election campaign so far. If you were trying to sum up Barack Obama's four years in office, he said, you could do it in a bumper sticker: "Bin Laden is dead. General Motors is alive".

Well, it's a little more complicated than that. But there's no questioning the vice president's populist instincts. That message is bound to be at the heart of the Democratic campaign over the next six months. It's pretty obvious politics.

But in that political calculus, there's a possible landmine for the Obama campaign. This week, one year after bin Laden's death in Abbottabad, Mr Obama took a swing at Mitt Romney on exactly this topic, using a dog-eared quote of Mr Romney's from 2007 to suggest that his rival wouldn't have approved the raid in question.

Scrambling to brush off what could be a tricky slight if it sticks – might as well say that you'd have given bin Laden bed and breakfast in the White House as have the US electorate think you didn't want him dead – Mr Romney dismissively argued that "even Jimmy Carter" would have ordered the raid. And, he added, it was a shame to see Obama using an event "that unified our country to once again divide us".

All's fair in politics, I guess, so it's hard to take a moral position against this sort of argument in isolation. As a piece of logic, though, it absolutely stinks. Leave aside that its proponents are members of the party that has made its greatest gains by politicising national security. The point is, if it's at all important, of course it's a matter of politics. If you think it's a significant thing to have done, it would be bonkers not to include it as a factor in your choice of president.

The weirdness of this argument – this was good, so you can't take the credit for it! – is elided by the way that 'politics' is so universally viewed as a dirty word. If you 'play politics' with something, you exploit it for the sake of your ambition. To me, it's manifestly absurd for anyone trying to be president to have a go at anyone else for being cynical in their pursuit of power, but if they can get away with it, good luck to them.

The reason I mind isn't so much that it's a piece of politics itself: it's because it's actually a little dangerous. Follow this argument to its logical, and not very distant, conclusion, and you'll find that any governmental achievement that's actually popular is disallowed as a part of your record.

Joe Biden's bumper sticker might not be terribly sophisticated. But it can't be excluded from the debate. After all, in the end, doing stuff that's popular occasionally means you're also doing stuff that's right.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in