Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

US warns mass withdrawal would be a disaster

 

Kim Sengupta
Wednesday 14 December 2011 06:00 EST
Comments
Soldiers from the US 234th Infantry Division. The Pentagon report suggests that any large-scale withdrawal should be delayed until 2014
Soldiers from the US 234th Infantry Division. The Pentagon report suggests that any large-scale withdrawal should be delayed until 2014 (AFP/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Any large-scale withdrawal of international forces from Afghanistan would help the enemy and undermine gains, according to a confidential US military report. The drawdown should instead, the report says, be avoided until as late as possible before the 2014 deadline for an end of the combat operations. The blunt assessment comes as Barack Obama and David Cameron face intense pressure to bring troops home as quickly as possible from the war.

The study highlights the need for about 2,000 more battle-hardened veterans to be deployed alongside Afghan forces. Although providing the reinforcements is a decision for the US Central Command, the British military is likely to receive a request for help.

Yesterday, the UK's National Security Council (NSC) met to consider the scale and pace of the British pull-out with some ministers supposedly demanding that the size of the 9,500 strong-contingent be cut by almost a half in the next 18 months.

Senior commanders, led by the Chief of Defence Staff, General Sir David Richards, have stressed that too precipitous a withdrawal could undermine the exit strategy. The NSC recommendations will be sent to Downing Street. A British general said: "We hope the Prime Minister is content to take military advice. But everyone is really watching to see what the Americans do. If they go for a faster drawdown, then David Cameron may feel he cannot expose his political flanks."

The Pentagon document states taking out additional troops next year would make it difficult to hold ground captured from insurgents.

The analysts caution that the "fluid situation in Pakistan as well as Afghanistan" must be borne in mind when working out the withdrawal timetable. An addendum to the document mentions "persistent rumours" of a "soft coup" in Pakistan.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in