Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Scientists plead with anti-GM protesters not to destroy crop

 

Friday 25 May 2012 05:16 EDT
Comments
Activists claim the GM wheat at Rothamsted uses dangerous technology
Activists claim the GM wheat at Rothamsted uses dangerous technology (Rex Features)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Three senior scientists made impassioned appeals yesterday to anti-GM campaigners not to destroy a field trial of GM wheat that is the culmination of several years' work.

The trial involves a wheat strain modified to be resistant to aphid pests, but an ad hoc group of activists, assembled in a campaign called Take The Flour Back, has said it will march to the trial site this Sunday and attempt to destroy the young crops.

The activists said the trial, at Rothamsted Research in Harpenden, Hertforshire, is a threat to agriculture because pollen from the GM wheat could contaminate non-GM plants outside the trial boundary. They believe GM is, in general, a dangerous and inappropriate technology for agriculture. But the scientists say cross contamination from the site is virtually impossible and that the new strain of wheat they are producing, besides being a boost to food security in an ever-hungrier world, has significant environmental benefits because it will mean the use of pesticides is lessened considerably.

At Rothamsted yesterday, three of the leading figures in the project spoke at length of their work and appealed to the protesters not to destroy it, saying they would be at the site on Sunday and would be happy to talk to the activists and answer their questions. "Call off your plans to destroy our experiment and come on the day and talk to us, but don't come in a mindset of destruction," Dr Gia Aradottir said. "This is a sustainable method that would reduce the carbon footprint for agriculture, if we don't need to be driving tractors spraying pesticides. Surely that's a good thing for environment?"

Professor Johnathan Napier said: "I would ask the protesters what their solutions are to the problem of food security with the growth of the human population... how are we going to feed nine billion people?"

The demonstrators plan to march to the trial site on Sunday for "a decontamination" of the site, a spokesman said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in