Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Osborne rejects Clegg's calls for 'wealth tax'

Thursday 30 August 2012 05:07 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Chancellor yesterday dismissed a call by Nick Clegg for the Government to bring in a temporary "wealth tax" on the rich to ensure the burden of a new round of spending cuts does not fall entirely on the poor.

George Osborne quickly made clear he is unlikely to impose any such "wealth tax", after the Deputy Prime Minister suggested the super-rich should face an extra levy on their estates and fortunes.

Mr Osborne, who in the last Budget announced a top-rate income tax cut from 50 to 45 per cent, beginning in April, to make Britain more attractive to entrepreneurs, said that he had already raised taxes on very expensive property transactions. "We mustn't drive away wealth creators, businesses," he said. "This country needs to compete."

Mr Osborne, who is under pressure from Tory MPs to cut taxes, has floated another £10bn of welfare cuts. In contrast, the Liberal Democrat conference next month will consider emergency revenue-raising measures including a 0.5 per cent tax on unearned income and the party's long-favoured "mansion tax" on homes worth more than £2m.

Labour accused Mr Clegg, above, of posturing ahead of his party's conference and displaying double standards after allowing Mr Osborne to cut tax for top earners. Allies admitted the Deputy Prime Minister was not outlining government policy but said the Liberal Democrats would press for a four-year "wealth tax" in negotiations with the Conservatives on a new spending programme.

The debate is set to continue, with a study today showing that almost half the population believes that politicians "don't get" the financial pressures facing ordinary people.

The Resolution Foundation found 43 per cent of adults agreed that "most politicians" did not understand the financial pressures facing people like them. The figure is highest (50 per cent) among those on low and middle incomes, the so-called "squeezed middle" earning between £12,000 and £48,000 a year – a key group including millions of floating voters.

A survey of 1,900 adults by Ipsos/Mori for the think-tank also found that 36 per cent felt "financially squeezed", while less than half (42 per cent) felt secure in their job.

Gavin Kelly, the foundation's chief executive, said: "As long as living standards continue to decline ... the public will carry on feeling that politicians just don't get it. Nick Clegg is clearly trying to react to this mood. As we move closer to the next election the electorate will expect a shift from empathy and floated ideas to carefully crafted policy proposals – which is going to be a real test for all the parties when money is so tight."

Simon Hughes, the Lib Dems' deputy leader, said: "There are many people who are sitting pretty on assets which they have not earned," adding that record levels of wealth inequality were "impeding growth".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in